Extensions in parameters should be part of the description column instead of the name column #9883
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Moved extensions from the last item in parameters-col_name to the last item of parameters-col_description (after examples)
Motivation and Context
Extension fields that are part of a schema show up on the right hand column, but extension fields on parameters are under the left hand column. This tends to result in extensions of even moderate length either wrapping or expanding the name column unnecessarily. It would be more consistent (and cleaner) to have those extensions appear under the description.
How Has This Been Tested?
Built the change and visually verified with & without other fields (such as example & examples)
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Checklist
My PR contains...
src/
is unmodified: changes to documentation, CI, metadata, etc.)package.json
)My changes...
Documentation
Automated tests